Thursday, August 24, 2017

WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT: Columbus Must Go

F LoBuono

I'm pretty much as Italian-American as they come - all of my ancestors come from there (Sicily mostly). And, I damned proud of it, too. But, I'm not blind or stupid. So, despite the stern objections by many Italian-American organizations who see him as a great hero, I still support the logic behind the current efforts to remove statues dedicated to Christopher Columbus.

Please follow my logic.

BACK STORY: In light of the violence that surrounded the proposed removal of memorial statues dedicated to Confederate Civil War heroes in Charlottesville, Va., awareness has been raised as to exactly WHOM we choose to honor with these statues. Many argue that those who supported slavery and oppression are certainly not worthy. Columbus, a hero to many, is also acknowledged as a slaver and oppressor of the indigenous people he encountered on his journeys of discovery and would fall into this category. Others claim that we cannot erase history and his accomplishments.

First, for those Italian-American organizations who see Columbus as intrepid navigator and the discoverer of the Americas. Well, he may have been born in (or, near) Genoa, Italy, as Cristoforo Colombo, but that, in a sense, was simply an accident of birth. At that time, there was no Italy as we know it today. It was a series of independent city statues or republics, of which Genoa was one. AND, it was controlled by the Kingdom of Spain. When Columbus attempted to secure funding, he originally went to the Kingdom of Portugal. When he failed there, he then successfully petitioned Spain. So, he sailed under a SPANISH FLAG with the majority of his crew being SPANISH sailors. In fact, judged his writings, scholars believe that Columbus probably spoke Spanish more than Italian (or, even its Genovese dialect)! He was even given a Spanish name; Cristobal Colon. Why do you think most of South and Central America speaks Spanish?! Columbus' descendants have served with distinction in the Spanish navy ever since. Well, there goes your Italian pride.

Second, Columbus NEVER set foot in what we know call North America. He landed on the island of modern Haiti and they called Hispaniola. He never made landfall anywhere near what is now America (which, by the way, is named after the cartographer Amerigo Vespucci - NOT Columbus). So, it really is a stretch to say that Columbus actually discovered America. In fact, it is believed that the Vikings actually reached NORTH America hundreds of years before Columbus.

Third, Columbus was a brilliant navigator but a shitty leader. No one can question his skills as a sailor. In fact, they are legendary. However, his lack of leadership qualities haunted him. His crews were almost always on the verge of mutiny. And, his brutal treatment of indigenous people was abhorrent. He used and abused them, solely for the advancement of his own fame and fortune. He was personally responsible for the deaths and enslavement of tens of thousands. This is hardly laudatory behavior!

So, When You Think About It, what's to memorialize - a man credited with discovering a country that he did not - an Italian who was more Spanish than Italian - and, a man who, for his own fame and fortune, caused immeasurable suffering among millions?

No, my friends, I would have no problem with the statues gone and Columbus relegated to where he belongs - in museums and history books. In this way, we can preserve history and still the honor the truth of what really happened.





4 comments:

  1. And he wrote and spoke only in Spanish. And "discovered" the world was round about one thousand years after the Romans and/or the Egyptians had discovered it was round. And when in "Haiti" if the locals did meet quota on the amount of gold they would bring to him, in some cases he would have a hand cut off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The mindless iconoclasm of Talk Frank. Christopher Columbus was not perfect, nor was Thomas Jefferson, FDR, Martin Luther King, etc. Teddy Roosevelt once said “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds…”

    The latest hysteria of toppling statues are a sign of ignorant people bereft of historical knowledge. Should we destroy the Aztec temples because they had human sacrifice. Look up Bartolome de las Casas, a Dominican priest who recorded Columbus actions a governor during that period. His observations are not favorable but the priest isn't without his critics. Again, Frank you seem to be the architect of a selective view of history. Try a more balanced approach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You didn't hear I thing I wrote. And, you published anonymously, the mark of a coward. So, I can't respond any further.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete